In Battlefield 6, the FX-8300 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
69%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
69%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
