In Battlefield 6, the FX-8300 is much slower than the Core i7-14700. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $352 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 88% cheaper – $46.90 vs $399.00
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.76 vs $3.16/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-14700
- Up to 107% faster in Battlefield 6 – 126 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 107% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i7-14700: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
48%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
49%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
126 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
11%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-14700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-14700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
