The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3400G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's £24.24 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8150
The Ryzen 5 3400G is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3400G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 25% cheaper – £73.98 vs £98.22
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
£73.98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
