FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The FX-8150 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
204
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
