Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-8120 - 287 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8120 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
