The FX-8120 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8120 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
