The FX-6350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6350
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-9960X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
FX-6350 vs Core i9-9960X
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
138
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-9960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-9960X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
8 MB
36%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
22 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9960X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,684.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake-X |
125 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 22 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
