Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3689 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 48% better in War Thunder than FX-6200 - 189 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 5 4500
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6200 | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
