In Battlefield 6, the FX-4350 is much slower than the Core i9-13900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $494 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 86% cheaper – $82.71 vs $576.99
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.35 vs $4.54/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-13900
- Up to 108% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 108% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
48%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
48%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.99
14%
Value, $/FPS
$4.54/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
