The FX-4300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 95 vs 165 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-10900X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-10900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
FX-4300 vs Core i9-10900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.97/FPS
100%
FX-4300 vs Core i9-10900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
