The FX-4300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-13600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
FX-4300 vs Core i5-13600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
214
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, £
£256.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.2/FPS
100%
FX-4300 vs Core i5-13600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i5-13600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i5-13600K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13600K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
