The FX-4170 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4170
The Core i9-14900 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-14900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
FX-4170 vs Core i9-14900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, £
£570.8
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.61/FPS
100%
FX-4170 vs Core i9-14900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4170 vs Core i9-14900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4170 vs Core i9-14900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4170
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4170 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
