The FX-4130 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10600K, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's £145.79 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 90% cheaper – £16.87 vs £162.66
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i5-10600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
FX-4130 vs Core i5-10600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£162.66
10%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
12%
FX-4130 vs Core i5-10600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10600K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $112.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
