The FX-4130 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4130
The Core i3-10105T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10105T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
FX-4130 vs Core i3-10105T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-4130 vs Core i3-10105T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i3-10105T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i3-10105T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i3-10105T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$112.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
