In Battlefield 6, the FX-4100 is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-9700K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $95 cheaper!
FX-4100
- Up to 47% cheaper – $105.36 vs $199.99
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.72 vs $2.35/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 7 days newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 7 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-4100 vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
73%
Price, $
$105.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
52%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
73%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4100 vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4100 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$115.00 | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
