Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4100 - 147 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4100 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |