The EPYC 9684X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 9684X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 192 vs 44 threads
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 145 vs 400 Watts
EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Average FPS
200
100%
Min 1% FPS
132
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
181
90%
Min 1% FPS
120
91%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 9684X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 9684X
Jun 13th, 2023
Cores
96-core
100%
L3 Cache
1152 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
23%
L3 Cache
55 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 9684X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 13th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$14,756.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Not Available | Codename | Broadwell |
400 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
Performance | ||
96 | Cores | 22 |
192 | Threads | 44 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
1152 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |