Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms EPYC 9354P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 924 days older than EPYC 9354P.
Advantages of EPYC 9354P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EPYC 9354P - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 9354P - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9354P doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 9354P
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9354P | vs | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
