Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 55 days newer than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 9174F - 161 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 120 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 7403 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 120 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |