Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 424 days newer than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than EPYC 9174F - 866 vs 728 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 65 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 9174F
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 320 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 5 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 41.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
