Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms EPYC 9124 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 310 days older than EPYC 9124.
Advantages of EPYC 9124
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 8% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 9124 - 219 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD EPYC 9124 - 65 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9124 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, £/FPS
£11.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2511.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9124 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
200 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |