The EPYC 7F52 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-11400F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 65 vs 240 Watts
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-11400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
186
94%
Min 1% FPS
123
94%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, £
£114.98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-11400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $157.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Not Available | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
