The EPYC 7F52 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-10600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7F52
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-10600KF
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 125 vs 240 Watts
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-10600KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Average FPS
186
97%
Min 1% FPS
123
97%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£112.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-10600KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-10600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7F52 vs Core i5-10600KF in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7F52
Apr 14th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7F52 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
240 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |