Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7773X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 138 days older than EPYC 7773X.
Advantages of EPYC 7773X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7773X - 273 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 7773X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7773X doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6813 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Mar 22nd, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7773X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |