Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 234 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than EPYC 7713 - 204 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7713 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7713 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7700 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |