Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 660 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 7713 - 672 vs 585 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7713
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
