The EPYC 7702 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7702
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 65 vs 200 Watts
EPYC 7702 vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
181
95%
Min 1% FPS
120
95%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, £
£226.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.18/FPS
100%
EPYC 7702 vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7702 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7702
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
12%
L3 Cache
16 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7702 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
