The EPYC 7642 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 96 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-13400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
EPYC 7642 vs Core i5-13400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7642
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
182
89%
Min 1% FPS
121
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, £
£157.36
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.76/FPS
100%
EPYC 7642 vs Core i5-13400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7642 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7642 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7642
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
48-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
21%
L3 Cache
20 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7642 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
48 | Cores | 10 |
96 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
