Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2301 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 30% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7551 - 287 vs 221 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£435.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7464 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7551 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |