Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms EPYC 7402 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7402.
Advantages of EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than EPYC 7402 - 131 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7402 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7402 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7402
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7402 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
