The EPYC 7401P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 3950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
The Ryzen 9 3950X is better in every way
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 3950X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 105 vs 170 Watts
EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 9 3950X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
90%
Min 1% FPS
116
91%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£799
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.13/FPS
100%
EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 9 3950X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 9 3950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen 9 3950X in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 3950X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $749.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Naples | Codename | Matisse |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 64 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
