The EPYC 7401P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-11900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 65 vs 170 Watts
EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-11900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
85%
Min 1% FPS
116
87%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, £
£266.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
100%
EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-11900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-11900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Core i9-11900F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $422.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Naples | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 170 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
