Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms EPYC 7313 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 668 days newer than EPYC 7313.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 58% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than EPYC 7313 - 112 vs 71 FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than AMD EPYC 7313 - 150 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7313 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
112
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£497.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £497.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7313 | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |