Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1256 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7302P - 208 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302P | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rome | Codename | Raphael |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
