Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 820 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7302P - 214 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £346.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8172 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302P | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |