Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Deathloop than EPYC 7302P - 191 vs 174 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302P | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
