Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 7302 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7302.
Advantages of EPYC 7302
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 155 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 26% better in Lost Ark than EPYC 7302 - 313 vs 248 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
EPYC 7302
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7302 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 16 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
