The Core i9-9940X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-9940X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-9940X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i9-9940X vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9940X vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9940X vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9940X vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9940X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $1,387.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
19.25 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
