In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9920X is quite a bit faster than the Xeon E5-2699A v4 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $380 cheaper!
Core i9-9920X
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6 – 81 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
- Up to 35% cheaper – $698.95 vs $1078.93
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Battlefield 6 – $8.62 vs $17.12/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Battlefield 6
Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 145 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 12% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
81 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$698.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.62/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
77%
Price, $
$1078.93
64%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
50%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
55%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
35%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$1,189.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
| 165W | Power Consumption | 145W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
