In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900KF is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 85% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 85% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
54%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
55%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
51%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$488.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
