Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 667 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900KF - 194 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £279.99 vs £299.21
- Up to 12% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900KF - £1.44 vs £1.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £299.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7036 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£279.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7036 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900KF | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |