In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900KF is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 3900XT and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $9 more expensive!
Core i9-9900KF
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Up to 5% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Jul 07, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Up to 2% cheaper – $389.99 vs $399.00
- Up to 2% cheaper
- Up to 6% better value in Battlefield 6 – $4.33 vs $4.63/FPS
- Up to 6% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 9 3900XT: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
86 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
94%
Price, $
$399
97%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
94%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Average FPS
90 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
100%
Price, $
$389.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3900XT Jul 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jul 7th, 2020 |
$488.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
