Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in New World than Core i9-9900K - 138 vs 121 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£20.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £20.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7267 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |