The Core i9-9880H is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-9880H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-10700F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- A faster CPU for gaming
Core i9-9880H vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9880H
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
185
97%
Min 1% FPS
123
98%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, £
£226.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.18/FPS
100%
Core i9-9880H vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9880H vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9880H vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9880H
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9880H | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |