Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i9-11900F - 561 vs 521 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £238.66 vs £499.98
- Up to 48% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-14900F - £0.46 vs £0.89 per FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
561
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
52%
Price, £
£499.98
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
521
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £238.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |