In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-14900F is slightly faster than the Core i7-14700. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $161 more expensive!
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6
Core i7-14700
- Up to 29% cheaper – $399.00 vs $559.99
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.16 vs $4.30/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Battlefield 6
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-14700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
71%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
73%
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
126 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
96%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-14700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core i7-14700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
83%
L3 Cache
33 MB
92%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
