Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Apex Legends than Core i7-10700F - 304 vs 283 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £242.36 vs £499.98
- Up to 48% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-14900F - £0.86 vs £1.64 per FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
304
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
52%
Price, £
£499.98
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
283
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£242.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £242.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |