Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13400F - 216 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |