The Core i9-14900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-6500T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-14900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6500T
The Core i9-14900 is better in every way
Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-6500T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, £
£570.8
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.61/FPS
100%
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
179
82%
Min 1% FPS
119
83%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-6500T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-6500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900 vs Core i5-6500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
53%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-14900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6500T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
$549.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |