Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 5700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 176 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Ryzen 7 5700 - 208 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £126.47 vs £427.67
- Up to 70% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900KF - £0.62 vs £2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.06/FPS
30%
Price, £
£427.67
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £427.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7152 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
204
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£126.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £126.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7152 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |